patching...
Breaking: Woman Seriously Hurt in Townhouse Fire »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

O'Malley Pushes for Wind, Gun Legislation

The governor's seventh State of the State address is seen by many as a prelude to an expected run for president in 2016.

 

Gov. Martin O'Malley Wednesday urged lawmakers to pass his offshore wind bill and find more money for transportation projects—though he offered no details on a gas tax initiative.

In his seventh State of the State speech, the Democratic governor also used his 35-minute address to remind legislators of what he sees as his major accomplishments since taking office in 2007.

In many ways, the speech seemed to lay the groundwork for what many expect will be a run for President in 2016.

Choice was a major theme in O'Malley's speech.

"Better choices. Better results. The proof is in our progress," O'Malley said.

[Read O'Malley's speech as prepared or watch it.]

O'Malley's Legislative Wish List

On the top of O'Malley's wish list are the passage of a bill creating a subsidy for an electricity-generating windmill farm off the coast of Ocean City, MD as well as stricter gun laws, the repeal of the death penalty and funding for transportation projects.

"There’s another important thing we can do this year to create jobs and that is off-shore wind," O'Malley said "Moving forward with off-shore wind could make Maryland, the new manufacturing hub for wind turbines. We will create jobs and we will generate abundant, clean, renewable energy, but only if we choose. Mr. Speaker, Mr. President, member of the General Assembly, let’s get this done this year."

O'Malley also urged lawmakers to deal with the growing list of unfunded transportation projects.

"There is no reason why we should be content with living with the worst traffic congestion in the country," O'Malley said.

Local jurisdictions have seen some of the biggest cuts in state transportion funding. Since 2007, most local governments have seen the amount of state money for road construction and repairs cut by 90 percent.

In his State of the State speech last year, the governor proposed a gas tax increase to fund those projects. O'Malley offered no such initiative this year.

Instead, he thanked Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller for his work on the issue.

Miller has called for a 3 percent tax on the wholesale price of gas in addition to the 23.5 cents per gallon Marylanders already pay.

The Senate president has also called for regional transportation authorities in the Baltimore and Washington areas that would oversee funding and construction of additional mass transit project such as the red and purple lines.

Miller's plan would also allow local jurisdictions to add a tax of 5 cents per gallon of gas to help fund local roads projects.

In the wake of shootings at schools in Newtown, CT and Perry Hall, MD, O'Malley is seeking stricter gun laws in the state.

"I ask you to ban the sale of military assault weapons in Maryland," O'Malley said. "I ask you to require a license for the purchase of all handguns but not hunting rifles."

The governor is also calling for the repeal of the death penalty in Maryland.

O'Malley said the death penalty is not an effective deterrent and "cannot be administered without racial bias."

"The death penalty is expensive and it does not work and we should stop doing it," he said.

Maryland has not executed an inmate since Wesley Eugene Baker in December 2005. Five inmates remain on death row but the state has had a moratorium on executions since the Court of Appeals ruled that execution protocols were not properly adopted.

Those protocols have not been updated because one of the drugs used in the three-drug cocktail is no longer available.

Republican Disapproval

O'Malley's speech was met with strong disapproval from House and Senate Republicans.

"He took credit for a lot of successes that don't exist," said Del. Anthony O'Donnell, House Minority Leader. "The people I know are all hurting and he wants to raise their taxes."

O'Donnell took issue with O'Malley's claim that job creation must be a top priority.

"It's all lip service," O'Donnell said. "He says that but then pushes policies that hurt businesses."

Rather than focusing on the specific needs of Marylanders, the policies O’Malley spelled out in his speech had more to do with Democrats’ national agenda of taxes and gun control, said Sen. E.J. Pipkin, an Upper Shore Republican and Senate Minority leader.

“He’s coming for your money…he’s coming for your guns,” Pipkin said.

White House Aspirations

For some, the speech was a prelude to O'Malley's expected run for President in 2016.

“Today wasn’t just a State of the State speech, it was an ‘I want your (presidential) nomination’ speech,” said Todd Eberly, assistant professor of political science and public policy at St. Mary’s College of Maryland.

As O’Malley, 50, enters the last half of his second term as governor, major speeches like the State of the State address can take on added significance.

O’Malley, who just completed two years as chairman of the Democratic Governors Association and was prominently featured at the 2012 Democratic National Convention, is widely believed to have national political aspirations.

His name has been mentioned along with New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, Vice President Joe Biden and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton as possible 2016 candidates for the Democratic presidential nomination.

"When he runs for President he's going to be the best thing that's ever happened to the Maryland Republican party," said O'Donnell. "He's going to make Republicans look like mainstream moderates. This guy is to the left of [President Barack] Obama."

Capital News Service reporter Lucas High contributed to this report.

Related Topics: 2013 Maryland General Assembly, 2013 State of the State Address, Bryan Sears, Death Penalty, E.J. Pipkin, Martin O'Malley, Maryland Senate, Maryland State of the State 2013, Thomas V. Mike Miller, and Todd Eberly

jakeblues56

7:53 pm on Wednesday, January 30, 2013

Tax tax tax.... God help us if he ever gets into the White House as anything besides a tour guide or a visitor- if there is anything left of America by 2016. By then maximum damage will have already been inflicted upon us. And if there is anything remaining untaxed, he will find it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tim

10:13 pm on Wednesday, January 30, 2013

He won't. Hell I couldn't vote for him, and I'm open to either party. He wouldn't be the worst president we ever had, but dear goodness if we cant do better.

Comment_arrow

Craig

10:35 pm on Wednesday, January 30, 2013

No doubt he would institute a Carbon tax. You breathed 20,000 times last week. You now owe $200!

Seriously, what don't they tax? I just got my Pepco bill... they stick a bunch of taxes and fees in there. Flush tax. Sales tax. Car tax. Income tax. Property tax. Gas tax. Gun tax (and confiscation).

Crazy!

Comment_arrow

Sanchez

11:20 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013

No, your tax on exhaled air is a POLLUTION TAX since the EPA ruled CO2 is a pollutant and bad for the Earth.

Comment_arrow

jag

12:56 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

I know, right? The thought of actually paying for all the services you receive must really disgust you, Craig. Free! I want everyone else to pay for my sewers and roads, damn it!

Comment_arrow

M. Sullivan

2:35 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Frank, CO2 is CO2, all the same regardless of the source, Einstein.

Comment_arrow

Sanchez

2:42 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

What can possibly be the difference between CO2 and CO2?

Steve

8:06 pm on Wednesday, January 30, 2013

I think he would make a great President (or Vice President for that matter)

Reply
Comment_arrow

Craig

10:33 pm on Wednesday, January 30, 2013

You have absolutely got to be kidding me. "He would make a great President??" Steve, I want you to move to Zimbabwe. Or Zaire. Or how about Greece? I heard Greece has a great economy run by socially-conscious and fiscally inept leaders.

O'Malley is terrible. Not a disaster, but terrible. He would be awful as President. He is partisan. He is boring. WHEN HAS HE NOT RAISED TAXES?

Do you support manufacturing Steve? Or is that liberal lip service? How about jobs? Not government jobs... you know, real jobs. Do you support those? How's Maryland doing? Without the federal largesse, where would we be?

You are clueless and it is really, really scary.

Comment_arrow

Steve

10:43 pm on Wednesday, January 30, 2013

"Federal largess" is over rated. It's one of the only talking points the MD Flat Earth Society's aka "Change Maryland" has.

Greece is fine. They are being bailed out by the Chinese.

Comment_arrow

Craig

10:47 pm on Wednesday, January 30, 2013

@Steve - Greece is fine??? Are you on the Soros payroll? Wow. I've heard of big-government and communist lovers, but you're making Statists blush.

Care to post in Mandarin?

Comment_arrow

Paul

9:16 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013

President?! HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, ................. you don't mean President of the United States?! Maybe President of the Montgomery County Irish Band Society, but President of the USA? Only if the US becomes 60% democrat and KKT doesn't run against him in the primaries!

Comment_arrow

amark

12:16 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013

Of course you do, you are a leftist tool.

George Helm

8:11 pm on Wednesday, January 30, 2013

He'll be hard pressed to get into the White House as he will have to make way for Hillary first and biden second if Hillary decides not to run. Don't count him out as a V.P. pick by either Hillary or Biden!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tim

10:15 pm on Wednesday, January 30, 2013

Now see, from a poly sci angle, I can totally see O'Malley as a VP candidate.

I also don't think Hillary wants it. Really. I have been very impressed with her work as Sec State (yes, Benghazi is a overhyped blip on the screen). I think based on her interviews it's changed her, though. I really think she's done with DC.

Comment_arrow

Craig

10:37 pm on Wednesday, January 30, 2013

Hillary will be 70 years old. Too old... plus there are health concerns. Sorry Hillary, your time came and went.

Here's the BIG secret: the Dems bench is WEEEEAK. No way O'Malley wins. You think he wins in the Midwest? Or in the South? HE IS BORING. He doesn't have the speech-making ability or the propaganda of Obama.

Comment_arrow

Steve

10:46 pm on Wednesday, January 30, 2013

The Republicans don't have anybody who can beat him. Are they going to run another "The Emperor's New Clothes" campaign like they did with Rmoney and locally with BGEhrlich.
Everybody working on the campaign was afraid to tell the candidate he was losing. The only person shocked on Election Day was the candidates.

Steve

10:31 pm on Wednesday, January 30, 2013

Bill Clinton is being tapped for the Ambassador to Ireland.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Craig

10:49 pm on Wednesday, January 30, 2013

O'Malley should be the Ambassador to Ireland. Get him the heck outta here and he can take his stupid rock band too.

Comment_arrow

kevin

12:11 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013

Steve,are you the Steve who got the$100,000 from O'Malley to start a phony opinion poll company? Opinion Works mission and the strange $100,000 grant to a Steve that will help change opposition by changing people'sperception.Now you are making sense.

George Washington

4:27 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013

I won't pay an honest American knows when our government has gone wrong!

Reply

Joe Galvagna

6:39 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013

Please stop our bleeding get these idiots out of office. Wind power OMalley base all the wind power we don't need. Where do these clowns come from and what idiots vote for them. He could not even make a good trash collector. OMalley please go back to where ever it was you came from.

Reply

Joe Galvagna

6:40 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013

Please stop our bleeding get these idiots out of office. Wind power OMalley has all the wind power we don't need. Where do these clowns come from and what idiots vote for them. He could not even make a good trash collector. OMalley please go back to where ever it was you came from.

Reply

Joe Galvagna

6:42 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013

People like OMalley are killing our State and our country we need to vote them out while we have any country left.

Reply

Chris W

6:54 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013

Democcrats are so easily led. All I hear from the left regarding the recent shootings is "we have to do something". I would argue that we have to do something meaningful.

Banning so called "assault weapons" might feel good, it might make you more popular with certain members of your constituency, but the CDC and justice department both concluded that the assault weapons ban had little real effect.

"In 2004, a research report submitted to the United States Department of Justice and the National Institute of Justice found that should the ban be renewed, its effects on gun violence would likely be small, and perhaps too small for reliable measurement, because rifles in general, including rifles referred to as "assault rifles" or "assault weapons", are rarely used in gun crimes"

Reply
Comment_arrow

jag

12:56 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

You are apparently ignorant of what the proposed gun legislation would consist of, if you're attempting to speak out against it.

patricia

8:02 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013

O'Malley says "the proof is in our progress", the key word being progress as in progressive. He's not mentioning the gas tax, because he's letting Senate President Mike Miller hustle that for him. Pay attention people, learn the difference between politicians, learn the difference between a democrat and a liberal progressive. Liberal progressives tax, tax, and then tax some more, but have nothing to show for it. Citizens don't mind paying taxes if the tax revenues are being used efficiently and wisely. The only problem as we have all witnessed, is that our tax dollars are not being used wisely, they are being squandered by progressives disguised as democrats. You know how to budget your own household, would you continue to pay for a service that you never get??

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chuck

1:16 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013

Why should we ever pay for services not rendered, let alone squandered by misuse, abuse, or "paybacks" to political affiliations, lobbyists, and the like ? Whether as individuals. states, or in the federal capacity ? The federal govenrment is claiming they can do a better job at "controlling" or running these things rather than charity or individuals/local/state government. Hows that been working ? It does not, never has. Study property rights and what that means as far as your own body, mind, and soul as it refers to the founders and Constitution. Not defending republicans but the progressives are a much,much more pro-socialism agenda driven political force that has little to no regard for the Constitution. There are scores of facts to prove it but don't look for it in our schools textbooks because that would not be "politically correct".

Comment_arrow

Cindy Walsh

12:57 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

As a progressive democrat I would like to distinguish O'Malley, who is a raging Third Way corporate liberal working for wealth and corporations and progressives like Russ Feingold who know how to maintain everyone's quality of life by making corporations good citizens.
Russ Feingold for President 2016

Native

8:19 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013

Why should someone need a license to buy a handgun in Maryland? They already have to clear a background check, take an online safety class, and wait seven days. This is clearly an effort to create burdens on law abiding citizens and won't do anything to prevent crime.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Matt

8:37 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013

Because we have the police to protect us, duh! Oh wait....

They don't have to protect you if you've called 911 repeatedly to report a threat. (Hartzler v. San Jose, Riss v. New York).

They don't have to protect you when you call 911 to report a break-in/rape IN PROGRESS. (Warren v. DC).

They don't have to protect you from the person you have a restraining order against. (Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dept, Castle Rock v. Gonzales).

They don't have to protect you from a person they have under active surveillance. (Davidson v. Westminster).

They don't have to protect you from a person IN POLICE CUSTODY. (Ne Casek v. Los Angeles).

They don't have to protect you from a person ATTACKING YOU, but they are allowed to hide (http://gothamist.com/2013/01/27/city_argues_nypd_had_no_special_dut.php)!

Not only all of the above, but they are also expert marksmen (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/25/empire-state-building-shooting-nypd-bullets-shot-all-nine_n_1830007.html)!

They don't want us mere peasants to be able to defend ourselves, yet the people that are in place to supposedly do so, don't have to!

Ddad99

9:07 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013

The only thing that has kept the rest of Maryland from looking like most of Baltimore is the spinoff economic benefits of being next to the federal government in DC. The offshore wind projects are uneconomical crony boondoggles. Wind power will do little to alleviate the coming electric shortages caused from shutting down coal plants, but will line the pockets of The Party's friends and sycophants.

If you don't know who the mark is, you're the mark. And friends, we are all marks in Maryland.

Reply

Buck Harmon

10:02 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013

If O'Malley would push for GANG control rather than gun control we might see an improvement with gun violence...as it is his efforts will be in vain and the worst part of gun violence will continue to escalate....kind of a dumb ass approach if you ask me...
Of course dealing with gang related problems is much more dangerous for O'Malley and his family I suppose....so violating the rights of law abiding citizens creates the illusion in attempt to justify his fat pay check...he's a pawn..

Reply

Richard Rice

11:09 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013

The best thing that could ever happen to the state of Maryland is if Martin
O'Malley the annointed one in his mind retires from politics for good! Under
his administration, and our so called president's I am much worse off now than I was financially when they took office. What about term limits for governors? Sounds like a good idea to me!!!

Reply

rich fiedler

11:11 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013

build them outside the state house, there's enough wind there to power Maryland.

Reply

Steve

11:15 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013

"So Called President"??? He is the real deal. Didn't you watch any of the inauguration?

Maryland already has term limits for Governors.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeff Hawkins

12:16 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013

Maryland governors are restricted to two consecutive terms in office, after which they must wait one term before being eligible to run again.

Vega

11:51 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013

Voting with their feet: People flee Maryland for Virginia
September 17 2012 by Christopher Cook | View other posts by Christopher Cook

Reply

Steve

12:00 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013

ROTFLMAO "Flee"?? I don't think so. Maryland's population keeps increasing.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sanchez

12:06 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013

How much of that increase in population are here illegally?

Comment_arrow

Steve

12:33 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013

MD's population is up 9% between the last two censuses and is projected to keep growing.

Nobody's "fleeing " anywhere. That's just a lot of hot air.

Comment_arrow

jag

12:56 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

"How much of that increase in population are here illegally?"

Practically none. Why?

P.S. grammar lessons. Check them out.

Comment_arrow

JustABill

1:07 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Steve, The entire country's population increased 9.7% and while Maryland's growth was only 9% below the national average it was the fastest growing state on the East coast in one major category, immigrants. I almost never use the Baltimore Sun as my go to source because of their blatant leftist slant on most articles but in this case they simply cannot recreate the facts from the Census so here you go.

http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2010-12-21/news/bs-md-census-population-20101228_1_hispanic-population-maryland-population-population-shifts

Ironically since O'Malley has been in office there was another 9% increase in the number Maryland residents in poverty as the numbers show from 2007 to 2011. So I do not think your misguided claim is all that incorrect, Maryland's population is growing but it is growing with the wrong people to help increase revenues through the tax base.

CP

12:05 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013

Wind is inefficient. Already proven so. So is solar. Dummies.

Reply
Comment_arrow

1ke

12:45 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013

Efficiency is a scientific term that refers to the ratio of energy input to energy output. Tell me more, Doctor. I mean, I am a layman, not a scientist like you.

Comment_arrow

CP

1:17 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013

Infrastructure. 99% of your posts are childish.

Comment_arrow

CP

1:21 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013

A list of just Obama backed companies. I cant imagine how many others are out there.

The complete list of faltering or bankrupt green-energy companies:

Evergreen Solar ($25 million)*
SpectraWatt ($500,000)*
Solyndra ($535 million)*
Beacon Power ($43 million)*
Nevada Geothermal ($98.5 million)
SunPower ($1.2 billion)
First Solar ($1.46 billion)
Babcock and Brown ($178 million)
EnerDel’s subsidiary Ener1 ($118.5 million)*
Amonix ($5.9 million)
Fisker Automotive ($529 million)
Abound Solar ($400 million)*
A123 Systems ($279 million)*
Willard and Kelsey Solar Group ($700,981)*
Johnson Controls ($299 million)
Brightsource ($1.6 billion)
ECOtality ($126.2 million)
Raser Technologies ($33 million)*
Energy Conversion Devices ($13.3 million)*
Mountain Plaza, Inc. ($2 million)*
Olsen’s Crop Service and Olsen’s Mills Acquisition Company ($10 million)*
Range Fuels ($80 million)*
Thompson River Power ($6.5 million)*
Stirling Energy Systems ($7 million)*
Azure Dynamics ($5.4 million)*
GreenVolts ($500,000)
Vestas ($50 million)
LG Chem’s subsidiary Compact Power ($151 million)
Nordic Windpower ($16 million)*
Navistar ($39 million)
Satcon ($3 million)*
Konarka Technologies Inc. ($20 million)*
Mascoma Corp. ($100 million)

Comment_arrow

Steve

1:30 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013

CopyPasta from the Heritage Foundation. What is their definition of "floundering"?

Comment_arrow

CP

1:33 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013

Those darn facts will get ya every time. Man you guys just cant win a debate can you? Unless we count insults.

Comment_arrow

1ke

2:58 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013

Oh, you are talking about financial viability, snotty-talking man.

That is a different proposition. Government has often been the jump-starter and financier of technical breakthroughs. Take, for example, jet propulsion, miniaturization of electronics, satellite technology, and genetic research. Only government can provide that degree of venture capital.

Similarly, it government provides the subsidies and military might that maintains the petroleum-based energy industry.

Comment_arrow

CP

12:56 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

"Government has often been the jump-starter and financier of technical breakthroughs. Take, for example, jet propulsion, miniaturization of electronics, satellite technology, and genetic research. Only government can provide that degree of venture capital."

The Soviets called. They were asking for you.

I don't know where you get the idea that Government drives success and innovation. No idea.

Temperance Blalock

12:15 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013

The only way that O'Malley could get support from any Maryland Republicans would be if he got drunk and went out boating, crashed into a boat full of small children, and then blamed it all on homosexuals.

Reply

amark

12:19 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013

Let's see, govt doesn't "create a market for a product (wind)". Maybe he would know this if he had spent any of his life outside of govt and had associated with anyone who was not a liberal democrat.

Reply
Comment_arrow

1ke

1:00 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Are we still talking about demand for electricity? What is this demand for wind?

amark

12:25 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013

This guy would never make it to the White house on his own. However don't be surprised to see Hillary pick him for VP which would immediately give him a national profile and he could ride her coattails. Anyone in this state who is not a liberal hack knows Owe'malley is a man of the extreme left. I know the typical ones on here will claim he's a moderate, lol.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeff Hawkins

1:04 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013

You are most likely correct about O'Malley's national appeal. He is the proverbial "big fish" in the "small pond" right now. He would not attract the support needed for the "big job". Could he be a VP candidate, sure anybody can.....just need to be asked. I think that's been proven.

FIFA_archived

12:50 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013

What are the values of the "extreme" left? Just wondering.

Reply
Comment_arrow

amark

1:27 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013

Is there one area you could identify where you could say, "that guy Owe'malley is a centrist"? No there isn't.

Comment_arrow

amark

1:30 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013

Come on, you know he is, just admit it. If Owe'malley is not a leftist than who is? Is there a governor in this country who is further left? Jerry Brown? Cuomo? Patrick? Owe'malley I believe is a leftist at heart but he's also trying to attract the far left base of the democrat party which dominates the primary. That's how we got the person we have in the white house today.

Comment_arrow

FIFA_archived

2:02 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013

You didn't answer a straightforward question.

amark said, "Owe'malley is a man of the extreme left."

You said it, please define "extreme left".

Comment_arrow

amark

12:57 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

The values of the far left include high taxes, including confiscatory rates on the "rich". Also massive govt spending to stimulate the economy rather than giving the private sector the ability to thrive. Near total govt control over areas such as education, healthcare, and many other areas of the economy. Obviously oppostion to the 2nd amendment. Their view is basically the state has the power over the individual (except on gay marriage and use of drugs, neither of which I really have a problem with btw, because I am consistent in my belief of freedom) in every area of their lives. We haven't gotten all the way there yet, but are moving closer every day.

Comment_arrow

J

12:57 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Extreme left would be someone who thinks that the government is the solution to every problem and seeks to control their constituents through taxation, regulation, and fear in order to advance a political agenda. (O'Malley would be the posterchild.)

By the way, has anyone ever asked themselves WHY O'Malley was under investigation by the FBI the entire time he was Mayor of Baltimore?

Comment_arrow

1ke

2:38 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

I wouldn't call that extreme left, amark. But, it more or less represents my stance.

"Rich" might equal two standard deviations beyond the average household income of approximately $50,000 per year in Maryland.

Stimulus in order to avoid sudden, massive deflation is indicated.

Education is viewed as a function of government not as an industry.

Basic healthcare is a right, not a commodity on sale to the highest bidder.

Firearms purchased in the open (transparently,eh?), registered and used for hunting or for sport is legitimate.

And, yes, we need to hang together or hang severally. Life is tough in a hard world with diminishing natural resources. Predatory individualism will be the death of nearly all of us.

Comment_arrow

amark

4:46 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

I believe in freedom and individual rights 1ke. You believe in collectivism. That is just a difference between you and me.

Comment_arrow

1ke

4:59 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Funny, though, amark, I feel kinda free. I mean, don't you?

There is not much that I want to do that I am prevented from doing. I guess my only limits are my lack of ambition and drive to be something other than what I am.

I feel badly for poor people who need a better cut of the action.

I hate institutional racism that carves the republic into pieces.

I do not like the fact that I am despised in some circles because I am an American.

Donald Kagle

2:29 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013

I am against O'Malley's off shore wind mill scheme (think Solyndra) as a hugh waste of money. I am in favor of wall to wall wind mills around the State House in Annapolis, as all the "hot air" produced there would keep them spinning forever.
Don

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeff Hawkins

2:39 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013

Don:
Now there is an idea that could get some traction...it is renewable, sustainable and cheap. :)

Comment_arrow

J

12:57 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Amen! Nice to see that at least one person in Maryland has seen the light...

Advice: Move south where freedom still exists while you still can...

Comment_arrow

jag

12:59 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

"think Solyndra"

What a freakin sheep. What, think Solyndra because some conservative nut told you to? Because Solyndra has exactly nothing to do with anything in this article. What on earth does a freaking windmill have to do with a private solar company? I can't stand people who are so uneducated that they just regurgitate whatever talking point they heard 3 years ago and pretend like it was ever relevant, much less to this situation.

Comment_arrow

Penelope Patch

10:04 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013

jag, have you ever thought of anger management classes?

J

12:57 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

O'Malley wants to regulate wind now? lol The guy is ridiculous!

His solution to everything is GOVERNMENT... When are the people in this state going to wake up and see that government is not the SOLUTION, government is the PROBLEM?????

I have been a law enforcement officer for more than 14 years now. NOT ONE SINGLE TIME have I seen a person who purchased a handgun legally use it to commit a crime. Yet, for whatever reason people on the left believe that if they just pass one more gun control law everything will be better? You are not preventing criminals from getting the guns. You are preventing law abiding citizens from getting the means with which they can protect themselves against criminals with guns! This somehow makes sense to the people in Maryland?

Look around you. All of the states in which concealed carry is legal have FAR LOWER rates of violent crime than Maryland. Yet, the states/cities with the most restrictive gun laws are overrun with criminals who prey upon an unarmed citizenry. That is just sad...

Reply
Comment_arrow

jag

3:58 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

wtf are you talking about?

A. the wind legislation has been pushed for years by O'Malley - pick up a newspaper, guy.
B. "NOT ONE SINGLE TIME have I seen a person who purchased a handgun legally use it to commit a crime" This quite possibly is the dumbest statement ever uttered and also completely misses the entire point of the reforms O'Malley is pursuing. "That is just sad..." indeed.

Comment_arrow

Penelope Patch

10:17 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013

J,
Thanks for putting your life on the line every day as a law enforcement officer. I am sure you never know what you are going to be confronted with on a daily basis. Having previously worked with government on many levels, you are absolutely correct in saying that they are the problem. Unfortunately, a lot of time and money is wasted on trying to work around the needless barriers concocted by government "lifers" who were in their positions by virtue of connections not intelligence or skill.

Folks are a little misguided about the gun issue. What they really need to be talking about is having appropriate access to quality mental health services. Our mental health system in this state is deplorable due to managed care and cost-cutting. We also need to be screening troubled youth at a much earlier point in their lives, versus turning a blind eye to what is seen coming in the school doors each and every morning. Teachers and school administrators can and must do better. We need to create a better safety net for our youth. Keep in mind that during O'Malley's tenure, he has consistently cut funding for services to children and families.

Chris W

12:59 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Americans are simply not prepared to make the lifestyle changes required to live off of wind and solar. Most renewables are way more expensive per kilowatt than traditional sources. If we were serious about energy independence we would be building nuclear power plants. Cheap, safe, and clean compared to other options.

Reply
Comment_arrow

jag

4:11 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

"Most renewables are way more expensive per kilowatt than traditional sources."

That's the entire point of govt. investment. Why do you think the "traditional sources" are affordable? First, generations of public investment, subsidization that still exists today on a massive scale. Second, over the years the cost of anything comes down as efficiency naturally goes up. Solar is already a fraction of the cost is was even 5 years ago. In another 5 years it might very well be cheaper than drilling, shipping, refining, transporting, distributing oil/coal. That's the entire point of investment and progress (I know that's a bad word in your circles, but it's true).

Comment_arrow

jag

4:36 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

"Second, over the years the cost of anything comes down as efficiency naturally goes up."

Though, to argue with myself, that certainly isn't necessarily the case with non-renewables. Obviously, setting up a massive rig many miles offshore because all the easy-to-reach oil is already out of the ground is extremely expensive compared to the good ol' days.

BadStatistics

1:07 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Not much description of successful wind-farming stories on here. I would like to point out that the UK and other Economically Developed Countries have successfully promoted and grown offshore wind farms to their (and their investors) advantages.

Furthermore, why should the United State's continue to lag behind our developed counterparts in 'other' energy? Can you please provide me with a concrete example of a new technology or energy sector where you think the United States should lead the World? It used to be NASA, for a penny on your dollar, led the United States from manufacturing marvel to technological haven. Now you want to cut their budget, while not reinvesting that money elsewhere. What do we put those funds into? Do we just spend now and forget investing in our future? Isn't that how we got to where we are now?

Reply
Comment_arrow

M. Sullivan

2:50 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

The only real reason for the success of alternative energy in Europe is cost. Economics will always control the ultimate success or failure of wind power unless it is artificially supported by govt. If fossil fuels were cheap in Europe, wind power would face the same obstacles as in the U.S.

Comment_arrow

BadStatistics

3:09 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Economics in Europe are that the government discourages fossil fuel usage through high taxation on their use/attainment. That's not really cost economics, that is good policy. How about we prop the gas tax up $3 a gallon here in the U.S., use the billions of dollars to fund additional public transportation and offshore wind farms that reduce our needs for fossil fuels. Would that make you feel better about it?

I just think we have the opportunity to do both.

Comment_arrow

Sanchez

4:22 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

"How about we prop the gas tax up $3 a gallon"

And that would do what to small business with 3 or 6 trucks on the roads every day?
What would that do to the price of food?
What would that do to the coat of EVERYTHING delivers by the use of fossil fuels?

Comment_arrow

Sanchez

4:27 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Why are we not doing more with natural gas? The ONLY alternative to transportation fuels we have now or for the next 30 years?

We will still need to drill for oil if for nothing else but the thousands and thousands of products we use daily that use oil in their manufacture. One 42-gallon barrel of oil creates 19.4 gallons of gasoline. The rest (over half) is used to make things like:
http://www.ranken-energy.com/Products%20from%20Petroleum.htm

Comment_arrow

jag

4:32 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Sanchez...it's called diesel. Diesel =/= gasoline. Not that I agree with BadStatistics, but that certainly isn't based off some loose relation to the "what about the small businesses!" talking point you're trying to regurgitate and fit to the situation.

Comment_arrow

Sanchez

4:36 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Regurgitate? Bite me jag! Go to hell.

When the price of gas rises so does the price of diesel. Regurgitate that!

1ke

2:40 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Check him out, CP. Tell him there is no role for government. You lout!

Reply

Sanchez

4:02 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

We can be secure in the knowledge that Owe'Malley will do a much better job than Spain did right?...

"Spain stops wind turbines to balance supply
Spain had to shut down some of its wind turbines on Wednesday as wet and windy weather caused a surge in green electricity generation at a time of low demand, grid operator Red Electrica said.
The country's thousands of wind turbines supplied a new record of 54.1 percent of demand early on Wednesday, forcing gas- and coal-fired power plants to run at minimum output to avoid system overload as hydropower companies drained brimming reservoirs."
http://www.reuters.com/article/2009/12/30/us-spain-wind-record-idUSTRE5BT2K620091230

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sanchez

4:03 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Spain Stops Green Energy Subsidies
Spain halted subsidies for renewable energy projects to help curb its budget deficit and rein in power-system borrowings backed by the state that reached 24 billion euros ($31 billion) at the end of 2011. “What is today an energy problem could become a financial problem,” Industry Minister Jose Manuel Soria said in Madrid. The government passed a decree today stopping subsidies for new wind, solar, co-generation or waste incineration plants.
The system’s debts were racked up as revenue from state- controlled prices failed to cover the cost of delivering power. Costs have swollen in the past five years because of an increase in regulated payments for the power grid, support for Spanish coal mines and subsidies for renewable energy plants.
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/44251

Comment_arrow

jag

4:40 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Are you an idiot? You think wind turbines meeting demand and some having to be temporarily shutdown is a bad thing? FYI, since, as you've made clear you're an idiot, coal plants are regularly shut down or brought online depending on demand as well. That's how a freakin power grid works, genius. Jesus help me, the things I have to explain to you.

Carol

6:56 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

I wuld like to say one reason we have so many things happening in this Country....We have taken God out of most things and if some people had their way they wouldn't want any body speaking the name God or Jesus unless it was cursing His name. When we were in School we never heard of the things kids have to deal with now days, and come on we are suppose to be so much better off then before. I think every School, Office Building and Police Dept. Local Officials and Government should pray each morning as we did before we started our Class and read from the Bible, I believe we would see a change in our Country our kids and the teachers and guess what it doesn't cost one cent not one cent. WE NEED TO PUT GOD BACK IN OUR SCHOOLS, OUR COUNTRY, AND OUR LIVES. WE NEED TO STOP LETTING PEOPLE TELL US WHAT WE CAN AND CANNOT DO IN OUR OWN SCHOOLS AND CUNTRY. PUT GOD BACK IN, HE WON'T PUSH HIMSELF ON ANYONE BUT HE WILL OPEN HIS ARMS TO EVERYONE.

Reply
Comment_arrow

M. Sullivan

12:53 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013

Hey Carol. "cuntry"? Hahahahahahahaha!

jm

8:10 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

DemocRATS keep drinking your kool aid. You fall for everythi g and stand for nothing .people are leaving md soon to be the California of the east so keep voting for those unamerican political azzes you deserve the government you voted for

Reply
Comment_arrow

Steve

8:37 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Like I posted before, people aren't leaving. We are gaining in population.

Tom Hope

3:55 pm on Sunday, February 3, 2013

I'll try to throw a different twist on this topic....
Look up the amendment Representative Jose Serrano from New York is proposing to the 22nd Amendment of our Constitution.

Reply

Leave a comment